v0.21.1
Tier list: not enough evidence
I am not publishing an S-to-D board. The independent database’s own tier page marks every bracket “Not yet rated” and says it has no verified leaderboard distribution and no first-hand match sample. The in-game standings show a top 50 per bracket, with a class filter since hotfix 0.18.1, and that board is not a public web page. Unverified community remarks are not evidence for a rank.
What would change my mind is a set of matches with dates, brackets and specs, or a leaderboard distribution I can read without logging into the client. Until then the honest table is empty on purpose. Version 0.21 also reset every rating to 1500 on 29 Oct 2026, so any older impression is about a ladder that no longer exists. Hotfix 0.13.1 separately fixed a bug that snapped ratings back to 1500 after a restart. Those two 1500 events are not the same thing.
If you want roles instead of ranks, read comps. If you want the spec kits, read classes. I would rather send you there than invent a Warrior S-tier.
Method, not a ranking.
| Rule | What I require |
|---|---|
| Sample | Dated matches or a readable leaderboard |
| Split | 1v1, 2v2 and 3v3 stay separate |
| Version | v0.21.1 after the 29 Oct reset |
| If missing | Say not enough evidence |
Questions
Why is the tier list empty?
No public win rate, pick rate, or leaderboard distribution.
Did 0.21 make Subtlety the best?
It buffed Subtlety. A buff is not a rank.
Where are the top 50?
Inside the game, per bracket. I did not find a public web copy in the sources checked.
Last checked: 2026-10-30. Public client notes through v0.21.1; not a live server version check. Sources: Official game · Official client changelog (single primary source) · Client-derived database (single origin).